Employee Involvement
Involving staff in planning in meaningful
ways was a primary objective of all of the deliberations and
resulting actions. In-service and workshop days involved all staff
in common activities. Employees also participated within existing
committees, by responding to surveys, and as volunteers in response
to specific project needs. Although initial efforts were
administratively driven, great efforts were made to obtain broad
input from SVCC staff and to avoid another administratively
designed system. A number of efforts were taken to obtain employee
input :
- November/December 2003, an environmental scan examined student
trends, departmental needs and organizational effectiveness in two
parts. All staff were encouraged to attend one of several meetings
to discuss these issues. Each meeting was facilitated by a
different individual or pair of staff members. Employees were also
asked to complete a written survey on the same topics.
- October 2004, an internal scan survey was conducted by the
Internal Review Team as a part of the SWOT Analysis, which asked
staff to identify the strengths and weaknesses of their respective
departments and of the College. Departments were asked to respond
to their respective weaknesses. The survey identified a number of
College strengths and weaknesses and resulted in a communications
survey that was administered in November.
- November 2004, a communications survey was administered to all
staff by the Internal Review Team, to probe the communication
weaknesses identified in the prior survey. The results were
considered by the Internal Review Team as a part of the SWOT
Analysis.
- August 2005, a staff survey was conducted as a follow-up to the
fall 2004 surveys to determine if the strengths and weaknesses
identified during the previous year had improved or
deteriorated.
In 2003, disciplines were grouped into nine academic areas for
assessment and planning purposes: communications, physical and
natural sciences; health; social and behavioral sciences; business;
humanities; mathematics; human services; technology. The role of a
faculty leader in each area was identified and explored. During the
summer of 2004, Area Facilitator positions were created to promote
discussion and improve communication among faculty, committees, and
administration. The College viewed the work of the area
facilitators as being important enough that facilitators, selected
from full-time faculty in each of the nine academic areas, were
compensated through either stipends or release time.
|